Two statements on the state of cinema

Introduce yourself to the community or chat with other users about whatever is on your mind
Suture Self
Posts: 545
0 Ratings
Your TCI: na
Joined: Fri Mar 09, 2007 7:30 am

Re: Two statements on the state of cinema

Post by Suture Self »

djross wrote:
SimonJones96 wrote:It's simply a binary "did you enjoy this movie or not".


Really? That's how it works? Just a thumbs up or thumbs down? Sheesh. Why does anyone ever look at it?

Yeah, each review is considered in terms of whether it was a "positive" review or a "negative" review, so it's a binary method.

Why does anyone ever look at it? I have no fucking idea. I find it worthless.

djross
Posts: 1212
10 Ratings
Your TCI: na
Joined: Sun Apr 16, 2006 12:56 am

Re: Two statements on the state of cinema

Post by djross »

x
Last edited by djross on Thu Jul 20, 2023 9:19 am, edited 1 time in total.

Velvet Crowe
Posts: 156
1137 Ratings
Your TCI: na
Joined: Thu Jun 03, 2010 3:26 pm

Re: Two statements on the state of cinema

Post by Velvet Crowe »

I recently looked at this article and gave me a lot of thoughts about the economics of the film industry today.

http://variety.com/2017/film/news/box-o ... 201950841/

To me, I think this spells out that what's successful in Hollywood right now is the appeal of franchises and colorful animated movies. Movies such as a Marvel film or Zootoopia are remarkably different than the films that were popular in the past (at least on an aesthetic level). Gone are the days where movies can be sold on directors or actors, now Hollywood has to sell itself on recognizable characters and brands. By all means, Iron Man is not successful because of the Robert Downey Jr name slapped onto every film he's involved in it.

But on the other end of this, I also think that with the advent of the internet people are also now more aware of the background of films as well. When we look at the failure of Ghostbusters, the patronizing director and cast were a massive turn off for the audience who they wanted to appeal to. I'm not particularly fond of the new Star Wars movies but I think one part of the reason why they're successful is that unlike the Ghostbusters movie it respects the source material it came from and even with all the shambles with diversity the cast never once aimed to insult the Star Wars fanbase.

Again, this ties back to the concept of franchises and branding - how Hollywood incorporates these brands is detrimental to their success. In the case of the TMNT movie, a large part of its failure was the fact that Michael Bay's version of quadruple was seen as extremely unappealing to turtles fans made worse by its panning by critics. While yes, the MCU is much different than the comics in the grand scheme of things, it's familiar enough to not be completely alien like the turtles were and the movie was of high enough quality that most critics didn't completely blast it for its quality. This is a balance that Disney has been striking very well.

In the case of panned movies like Suicide Squad, the Appeal of that movie was, again, branding. While they did strike out on the balance of making a "quality" movie on the level of Marvel's standards, their marketing was exceptional and the character Harley Quinn became a money making magnet for DC. They sold the movie on its branding alone - people recognize the DC logo and they recognize the cast of characters the film utilized. This is an example of the previous trend I mentioned - people came to this movie to see Harley Quinn, not her actress Margot Robbie.

In a sense, these tactics are not too dissimilar to what we've seen in the past with iconic movie brands such as Star Wars, Lord of the Rings, and Indiana Jones. However, nowadays, these brands have expanded significantly to the point that the actors/directors are mostly irrelevant and they have been overtaken by the characters that they play. At this point, who really cares about the people playing the leads in Rogue One or whoever is playing Scott Lang in Ant-Man? While initially I do think the star power of Robert Downey Jr. and Scarlett Johanson helped jump start the Marvel cinematic universe, it's come to the point that so long as the actor can do a semi-competent job at playing their role it doesn't really matter too much who they cast.

Now, as far as the outset goes for filmmaking in general, I don't think it's "killing cinema" but I find great displeasure in that it encourages filmmakers to make safe movies for the sake of massive profit. Marvel/DC comics and the Star Wars EU are far more nuanced, diverse (in terms of storytelling), and interesting than what these movies would portray them to be as. I recently read Dan Slott's run on She-Hulk and all I could keep thinking of at the end was that there was no way Disney would ever allow for such a clever and interesting script comparable to the dialog written in those comics.

While I don't completely hate the MCU (I did give good ratings to Doctor Stange and Winter Soldier after all) I get the impression none of them will ever reach beyond the typical Marvel movie formula. All the movies feel very samey to me and it's a real mixed bag of whether or not they do that samey thing well. That said, it's still tiring regardless. I didn't like films such as Sully or The Infiltrator but I thought both were remarkably more interesting what they attempted to do as films in contrast to the same shit Marvel always does. Personally, I just hope Hollywood doesn't feed too much into this whole franchise idea because I think that'll be harmful for a lot of potentially good films.

paulofilmo
Posts: 2586
5 Ratings
Your TCI: na
Joined: Mon Apr 07, 2008 3:40 pm

Re: Two statements on the state of cinema

Post by paulofilmo »

foreign markets is a good point. sorry if someone had already mentioned it.
DrewTheDude wrote:http://variety.com/2017/film/news/box-office-2016-rogue-one-finding-dory-china-1201950841/

"“The LEGO Batman Movie,”"

jesus christ.
no, it was seeing the bus adverts for "Pixels" that made me back away slowly from reality.


Has anything changed since 2011?:
viewtopic.php?f=6&t=2736
i do a massive quote dump on page 3. I can think of Mad Max and Deadpool as having broken the rules.

lisa-
Posts: 286
192 Ratings
Your TCI: na
Joined: Tue Jul 30, 2013 9:22 am

Re: Two statements on the state of cinema

Post by lisa- »

i was just looking at that superhero thread, and, for the record, the number of "popular" and "very popular" superhero films of the 2010s has now outstripped the 2000s, with 41 vs 40.

Luna6ix
Posts: 501
0 Ratings
Your TCI: na
Joined: Sat May 17, 2008 3:26 pm

Re: Two statements on the state of cinema

Post by Luna6ix »

Pretty much any person of age would mirror Scorsese's statement about most art forms, the same would be true about pretty much every previous decade. I think this is for a couple reasons, people remember the past with rose tinted glasses. People also tend to forget about mediocre movies. If you only remember the good movies, and they seem better because of nostalgia, then of course people are going to think that today's movies are crap compared to the ones they remember. The same goes for music, there were a lot of people that were saying that music was dying when grunge took hold in the 90's, people who said that it was dying when hip hop became popular in the 80's, people who said that rock and roll was a travesty in the 50's, people who said that swing was a monstrosity in the 30's. It's harder to see trends in movies because the genres have more or less remained consistent over the years, but there are and always have been changes that people are likely to see as detrimental.

paulofilmo
Posts: 2586
5 Ratings
Your TCI: na
Joined: Mon Apr 07, 2008 3:40 pm

Re: Two statements on the state of cinema

Post by paulofilmo »

it's not that the kids are wrong, it's just that they have easy access to brooding swedish crime dramas

djross
Posts: 1212
10 Ratings
Your TCI: na
Joined: Sun Apr 16, 2006 12:56 am

Re: Two statements on the state of cinema

Post by djross »

x
Last edited by djross on Thu Jul 20, 2023 9:19 am, edited 1 time in total.

AFlickering
Posts: 641
287 Ratings
Your TCI: na
Joined: Mon Feb 26, 2007 6:15 pm

Re: Two statements on the state of cinema

Post by AFlickering »

everybody here with an ounce of intelligence should start using CRU and never open a RT page ever again.

http://criticsroundup.com/2016-rankings/

Jorg
Posts: 123
0 Ratings
Your TCI: na
Joined: Sat Jul 07, 2012 7:44 am

Re: Two statements on the state of cinema

Post by Jorg »

AFlickering wrote:everybody here with an ounce of intelligence should start using CRU and never open a RT page ever again.

http://criticsroundup.com/2016-rankings/


Knight of Cups (2015) is ranked higher there than La La Land (2016): https://www.rottentomatoes.com/m/knight_of_cups

I guess both sites are rigged :roll:

Post Reply