[noted] more sorting options for collections

Ideas to improve Criticker and new feature requests, as well as announcements about new enhancements.
livelove
Posts: 623
0 Ratings
Your TCI: na
Joined: Thu Sep 17, 2015 9:36 pm

[noted] more sorting options for collections

Post by livelove »

Collections can be sorted by: name, update time, and stars.

:idea: suggestion: could you make the other column headers (collection owner, "films", "seen", and "avg") clickable as well ?

thank you.

Image
Last edited by livelove on Wed Aug 01, 2018 2:55 am, edited 2 times in total.

mpowell
Posts: 3129
51 Ratings
Your TCI: na
Joined: Fri Sep 09, 2005 10:22 am

Re: more sorting options for collections

Post by mpowell »

We can think about this one. I can't remember exactly why we left some possible options un-sortable, but if memory serves it had something to do with speed. We'll revisit this, next time we revamp this page.

livelove
Posts: 623
0 Ratings
Your TCI: na
Joined: Thu Sep 17, 2015 9:36 pm

Re: more sorting options for collections

Post by livelove »

mpowell wrote:We can think about this one. We'll revisit this, next time we revamp this page.
that would be great. thank you

livelove
Posts: 623
0 Ratings
Your TCI: na
Joined: Thu Sep 17, 2015 9:36 pm

Re: [noted] more sorting options for collections

Post by livelove »

mpowell wrote:I can't remember exactly why we left some possible options un-sortable, but if memory serves it had something to do with speed.
I can see that occurring if you recalculated the Avg% column. But couldn't you sort that column without recalculating? Other than that I can't really see a speed issue or any other difference between sorting by numbers vs alphabetically by name, especially since you already allow sorting by date and by #stars.

Post Reply