tef wrote:Someone's never heard about John Stuart Mill.
I have, and even read his works.
tef wrote:You speak as if your taste were objectively correct and it isn't so.
I never said they were. But saying Conrad "sucks" and "plagiarized his shit" is really damn ignorant. Had you simply said "I don't like Conrad's work", that would have been a different matter.
tef wrote: You also take shit way too seriously and I never have anything valuable to add to any discussion.
Indeed! Seriously, link me to
any post that you have made in the last 6 months which actually discusses movies, instead of off-topic ramblings, bragging about how brilliant and awesome you are, or other assorted nonsense.
tef wrote:I used to read 3-4 books a day, every day. I was raised by a demanding family. I'm also much older than you are.
You're still defending your ludicrous claim that you have consumed over 30,000 books in your life? What were they, picture books? Assuming they were normal-sized, 400 page books, you were apparently reading 1200-1600 pages every single day?
So at a (very fast) rate of 3 pages per minute, you were spending anywhere from 7 to 9 hours a day reading, every single day?
Reading 3-4 books a day, every day, would still take you 27+ years to read 30,000 books. What were you, consuming literature at that rate while still in your mother's womb?!