QMDB Recommendations - Part 2

Introduce yourself to the community or chat with other users about whatever is on your mind
paulofilmo
Posts: 2586
5 Ratings
Your TCI: na
Joined: Mon Apr 07, 2008 3:40 pm

Re: QMDB Recommendations - Part 2

Post by paulofilmo »

Ah right. I think I get it now. I first read that, looking at it blankly; non-the-wiser.

So for you (for example), 1997 is the median where the films have a good ratio between the age of a film you choose to watch and also the kind of films you think highly of. That's understandably difficult to put into words, but I think I get the gist of it.

Quicky
Posts: 451
0 Ratings
Your TCI: na
Joined: Mon Feb 25, 2008 2:53 pm

Re: QMDB Recommendations - Part 2

Post by Quicky »

Exactly ;)

Note: I will be on vacation from Tuesday 8th till Thursday 24th of July, so I will not be here to make any lists for people. If you want (an updated) one, just let me know and I'll get to it when I get back!

Quicky
Posts: 451
0 Ratings
Your TCI: na
Joined: Mon Feb 25, 2008 2:53 pm

Re: QMDB Recommendations - Part 2

Post by Quicky »

A first recommendations list for LordofDance: http://thequicky.net/qmdb/lordofdance-q ... 080918.pdf

krmr
Posts: 5
0 Ratings
Your TCI: na
Joined: Tue May 16, 2006 6:22 pm

Re: QMDB Recommendations - Part 2

Post by krmr »

I'm a bit of a lurker on the forums, but I'd love to get the QMDB treatment. I was actually attempting to do something similar with my own database of ratings, but yours is much bigger in scope and better because of it.

Quicky
Posts: 451
0 Ratings
Your TCI: na
Joined: Mon Feb 25, 2008 2:53 pm

Re: QMDB Recommendations - Part 2

Post by Quicky »

There have been some updates to my QMDB algorithm over the summer.

  • First of all, there was a bug which switched the parameter weights of two parameters which could cause inaccurate results for those people who had very different weights for these parameters. This has now been fixed, so my QMDB is performing better now than it was before. I found the error when I was brainstorming about possible reasons for my QMDB to perform worse than Criticker which is theoretically impossible since my QMDB algorithm optimizes the weights such that it reaches the best fit, which if Criticker would be perfect would converge on a weight of 100% for the PSI's. Apparently this flaw was caused by the swap of these two parameter weights.
  • Secondly I have now split up the names parameter properly into directors/writers and actors. This means that on the first page of your QMDB list, you now have top/bottom lists for director/writers, actors and keywords separately.
  • Lastly, I decided to not exclude movies from the varied top recommendations list that are currently a new release according to Criticker.

Image

I have made new lists for paulofilmo and kramertron which incorporate these updates:

If you want an updated list (also correcting the bug listed above), or you have never asked for a QMDB list before but are interested in getting one, please let me know either here in the thread or by PM.

As always, I can only improve these lists if I get feedback from you on what you like and what you don't like and why, and why you use or don't use the list in practice ;).

Quicky
Posts: 451
0 Ratings
Your TCI: na
Joined: Mon Feb 25, 2008 2:53 pm

Re: QMDB Recommendations - Part 2

Post by Quicky »

Current performances*:

  • Quicky: Lowest 3 User TCI's: 1.63, 1.69 and 1.70, Criticker TCI: 1.52, QMDB TCI: 1.32
  • paulofilmo: Lowest 3 User TCI's: 1.90, 1.90 and 1.92, Criticker TCI: 1.99, QMDB TCI: 1.77
  • kramertron: Lowest 3 User TCI's: 1.21, 1.59 and 1.72, Criticker TCI: 1.69, QMDB TCI: 1.39

As you can see, my QMDB system improves Criticker's recommendations by lowering the TCI another 0.2 to 0.3 points for these three people, meaning it improves the accuracy of the recommendations by roughly 15%.

*Note: The Lowest 3 User TCI's are the Taste Compatibility Indexes (lower is better!) for the top 3 users here on Criticker that are closest to your taste. The Criticker TCI is a TCI-value** for how closely Criticker's PSI's resemble your actual taste in movies, i.e. how good Criticker is at guessing whether you'll like a movie or not. The QMDB TCI is a TCI-value for how closely my QMDB system resembles your taste in movies.

**Note: for the Criticker and QMDB TCI's, I use a fitting algorithm that is skewed to the best movies, as opposed to the way Criticker fits tastes uniformly over the spectrum of movies from good to bad. The reason I do this is simply because I believe it is a more helpful way to compare movie tastes.

paulofilmo
Posts: 2586
5 Ratings
Your TCI: na
Joined: Mon Apr 07, 2008 3:40 pm

Re: QMDB Recommendations - Part 2

Post by paulofilmo »

Great job on getting my best TCI, Quicky. And thank you for another update; intriguing stuff.

I actually have 12 of my varied top recommendations and 5 of my 'more recommendations' immediately available to me, so I'll put some focus on those.

LOL at Ethan Hawke being in my top 10 actors. I don't like him, but he picks some fine scripts.

My key words are spot on, excitingly so. I'll introduce a 'Naturalism' keyword if there isn't already one.

Quicky
Posts: 451
0 Ratings
Your TCI: na
Joined: Mon Feb 25, 2008 2:53 pm

Re: QMDB Recommendations - Part 2

Post by Quicky »

Spunkie asked me to do a list for him, so here goes: click!

Spunkie
Posts: 473
196 Ratings
Your TCI: na
Joined: Tue Mar 27, 2007 6:47 am

Re: QMDB Recommendations - Part 2

Post by Spunkie »

Yay, cheers 8-) ! After an examination it's easy to see your system works quite good.....except :KEYWORDS Your Bottom 10 helicopter. I have no prejudice against choppers :lol:

This is ironic
EXAMPLE TIERS
T5 Good Superbad (2007)

paulofilmo
Posts: 2586
5 Ratings
Your TCI: na
Joined: Mon Apr 07, 2008 3:40 pm

Re: QMDB Recommendations - Part 2

Post by paulofilmo »

Quicky, I've seen about four of the films from your recs pdf. Is there any specific input you're after, or are you after ideas?
Last edited by paulofilmo on Sun Nov 09, 2008 12:18 pm, edited 1 time in total.

Post Reply