Most Prolific Contributors

[yug]

Is it possible to somehow compile the list of the most prolific contributors to the cricketer community? Could be on the basis of submission of the entire new titles or individual contributions.

[MacSwell]

That'd be pretty cool. I've contributed 340 films (and over 2,700 posters) and often wonder where I'd place on an all-time leaderboard of contributors.

[dardan]

Pretty sure the no. 1 would be Ag0stomesmer (https://www.criticker.com/profile/Ag0stoMesmer), who has submitted a staggering 3288 titles: https://www.criticker.com/?fl&filter=e28232, though the person tracking criticker's average ratings (https://www.criticker.com/profile/avgcrtckr), amongst many other averages, is also a serious contendor.

[MacSwell]

Gauntlet has submitted 11,338!

[edkrak]

Some >1000 I could think of (and that's almost 40% of all titles submitted already!):
1. Gauntlet: 11338
2. PUNQ: 7404
3. kyle.loomis: 6292
4. Ag0stoMesmer: 3266
5. hotsake: 2901
6. Vandelay1: 2280
7. Gregzilla: 2278
8. ladyspiggott: 1953
9. PeaceAnarchy: 1859
10. Stain: 1400
11. edkrak: 1312
12. toro913: 1257
13. redpatriot: 1048
14. MartinTeller: 1017

Anybody missing from this list?

[yug]

These are really massive numbers. Thanks for these! I am currently at a measly 337. I hope to reach the 1000's in at least couple of years.

[mpowell]

Let's make it official. Huge thanks to everyone who's helped our database grow!

1. Gauntlet - 11338
2. PUNQ - 7407
3. kyle.loomis - 6322
4. Ag0stoMesmer - 3266
5. hotsake - 2941
6. Vandelay1 - 2280
7. Gregzilla - 2278
8. ladyspiggott - 2005
9. PeaceAnarchy - 1859
10. Telemecus - 1815
11. iceblox - 1533
12. Stain - 1400
13. edkrak - 1312
14. toro913 - 1257
15. Dunstan-xxx - 1172
16. ehk2 - 1066
17. redpatriot - 1057
18. MartinTeller - 1017
19. Carlospro - 968
20. djross - 899

[djross]

x

[yug]

And so, in the spirit of not wanting to abuse our generous hosts, I have always tried to avoid adding movies just for the sake of making a bigger database.

I feel this is an important point raised by djross. I have always thought about it. How much are the resources strained by the submission of one title? Does it make sense to add movies which will be rated only by couple of folks or are too obscure for the taste of the Criticker members? If every new submitted title affects the resources in some significant way, then it might be a wise policy to restrain such submissions. It would be really helpful if I/we get a clarification on this from our generous hosts.

Thanks!