For Pete's sake, here we go again ... iconogassed making stuff up that simply isn't there.
And thanks for calling me a liar by the way. I really
was surprised to see the movie poster. Who wouldn't be ?
iconogassed wrote: ↑Tue Mar 14, 2023 4:16 am
your pathetic provocation […] fucking complimented […] your nonsense "astonishment" […] a pain in the ass. But it does make you really, really bad at the lame-ass shit you're trying to pull. So kindly fuck off with it.
Your mean-spirited language isn't deserving of any answer. I'm only answering just in case somebody else wonders:
iconogassed wrote: ↑Tue Mar 14, 2023 4:16 am
You wrote that "[the shot] looks too much like [the poster]". The only conceivable reason you would post that, in English, is as a criticism.
There are a million conceivable reasons. And just because you are so single-minded or simple-minded that you see only 1 possible reason, which you even make up out of thin air, really isn't my or anybody else's fault here.
If you don't know something, better ask than make false assumptions.
iconogassed wrote: ↑Tue Mar 14, 2023 4:16 am
"Too much" means "more than justified or appropriate".
no.
"Too much" just means that:
"too much".
And
"too much" can sometimes mean
"very much" in English. Which was the intended meaning here.
Just for the record:
What your quoted sentence meant, was:
This image looks too much like this poster
for me not to take a guess here.
This image looks too much like this poster
for it to be a mere coincidence.
This image looks too much [so much] like this poster,
that I'm pretty sure they are the same.
With that being said, that's my last comment on that. I'm out of this unfriendly and distracting "discussion".
(I think that's the first unfriendly exchange I have seen here in the forums in all those years. I thought this place would somehow magically be exempt from such negativity among fellow cineastes.)