What are your "full reviews"?

Introduce yourself to the community or chat with other users about whatever is on your mind
djross
Posts: 1239
Your TCI: na
Joined: Sun Apr 16, 2006 12:56 am

What are your "full reviews"?

Post by djross »

There is no simple way of keeping track of what films one has written about in the "full reviews" section of the boards here. The "simplest" method seems to be to go to that section, then sort by "author". But I thought it may be worthwhile to have a spot to keep a list of these reviews. That said, I know that there are some users who have written many many reviews in that section, and I'm not suggesting they should bother to list them all here. For myself, however, in ten years there have only been three (one posted today), and so it's not too onerous a task to provide the links. None of these three are really "full" reviews: more an attempt to analyse or draw attention to one specific aspect.


Off Criticker

On Criticker

See also
Last edited by djross on Tue Jul 25, 2023 5:53 am, edited 26 times in total.

karamazov.
Posts: 114
Your TCI: na
Joined: Wed Jul 03, 2013 11:34 pm

Re: What are your "full reviews"?

Post by karamazov. »

Capital idea.


'14:
"Minnie and Moskowitz" [Cassavetes, 1971].
"Rebecca" [Hitchcock, 1940].
"A Dangerous Method" [Cronenberg, 2011].
"The Gospel According to St. Matthew" [Pasolini, 1964].
"Ichi the Killer" [Miike, 2001].
"Inland Empire" [Lynch, 2006].

'15:
"The Hobbit: The Battle of the Five Armies" [Jackson, 2014].
"Nymphomanic" [von Trier, 2014].
"The House of the Devil" [West, 2009].
"Sedmikrásky {Daisies}" [Chytilová, 1966].
"The Wicker Man" [Hardy, 1973].

'16:
"Mysterious Skin" [Araki, 2004].
"The Revenant" [Iñárritu, 2015].
"Rashômon" [Kurosawa, 1950].


tbh most of these aren't really in any sense 'full reviews'-- fwiw I'd say the MS review both best fits that criterion and is probsly my best contribution to 'film criticism' [lol], but ymmv...

TheDenizen
Posts: 1639
Your TCI: na
Joined: Thu Apr 13, 2006 12:51 pm

Re: What are your "full reviews"?

Post by TheDenizen »

I like this idea too.

Threads - viewtopic.php?f=20&t=2319
Samurai Cop - viewtopic.php?f=20&t=2813
Conan (2011) - viewtopic.php?f=20&t=2893
The Raid: Redemption - viewtopic.php?f=20&t=3299
Ninjas and Dragons - viewtopic.php?f=20&t=3657
Bruce Lee vs Gay Power - viewtopic.php?f=20&t=5678

AFlickering
Posts: 647
Your TCI: na
Joined: Mon Feb 26, 2007 6:15 pm

Re: What are your "full reviews"?

Post by AFlickering »

i was gonna do this but tbh most of mine have been improved on elsewhere. if anyone happens to be interested they may as well just follow 'tom nixon' at letterboxd, or aflickering at rateyourmusic, or google 'tom nixon the missing slate', etcetc.

paulofilmo
Posts: 2586
Your TCI: na
Joined: Mon Apr 07, 2008 3:40 pm

Re: What are your "full reviews"?

Post by paulofilmo »

^just enjoyed your Cosmopolis review. And nice to see JakeAesthete on there, too - luxuriated in his mauvais sang.

[argh. should've gone to bed half-an-hour ago.]

djross
Posts: 1239
Your TCI: na
Joined: Sun Apr 16, 2006 12:56 am

Re: What are your "full reviews"?

Post by djross »

In case anyone is interested, the latest version (that is, the 2024½ edition) of the document compiling (and extending) all my reviews here (minus some short films), plus extracts from other writings of mine on film, has been uploaded here:

https://www.academia.edu/94550175/Movin ... nal_Record.

Post Reply