KastryDonut

Bio: SOMEONE TELL IT HOW TO ADD LINE BREAKS IN THE BIO!!!

99-100: Best
96-98: Must-see
90-95: Incredible
78-89: Good
60-77: Watchable
41-59: Skip-worthy
23-40: Averse
11-22: Avoid
5-10: Hate
0-4: Torture

Ratings are based on a mix of the absolute aesthetic value of the art (i.e. its disposition to self-actualize the kinds of communities and agents that could possibly engage with the art) and how the art affected it personally. So, it might recognize that an artwork is very good, and that may influence its score even if it personally got very little out of it.

A lot of (usually lib) folks who evaluate art tend to fetishize "craft" and take moralizing the content to be "beneath" art criticism, which is just an obviously indefensible theory of aesthetic value, a myth which was propagandistically proliferated during World War II. What's more is that people lie when they say they are providing morally neutral art criticism anyway. its scores are unabashedly holistic, let all the components of all media weigh on its value.