That there is some kind of monster behind the tree ?
With all those hints to "look closely at what has changed between the images" ?
In fact, you can already clearly see the monster's feet changing position between images #1 and #2:
Did you really look closely at the images ?
I have a hard time understanding you didn't see anything if you really looked.
... especially after Philamental came so close already:
I immediately confirmed, that Philamental is on the right track with these 3 leads. And later on, I ruled out 2 of them (the empty seat and the ladies), so the little girl was all there was left. And the monster-thing is right besides her.philamental wrote: ↑Fri Feb 24, 2023 2:28 pmWell this is fun regardless!
As for 'look closer', I tried to do that already. My gut instinct was that there was something in the trees near the little girl, as if it was about to snatch her in the coming moments, which is the type of thing that would be shockingly memorable, but may again be influenced by my Mulholland Drive thought process.
The other thing that is in my head is that the empty seat is quite prominent in the shot composition which might mean something, but unless Ant Man is sitting on it, I'm not sure how I can look closer at it!
The only real difference between the two images is that the woman in the foreground has moved slightly from blocking one seated lady to another. I don't recognise either nor see anything about them that would serve as a hint to the answer.
I would have hoped for Philamental to continue with his guesswork, as he was already so close.
But anyway ...
... now we know we have an Oscar nominated movie with some kind of monster.
With this information and your excellent sleuthing prowess, the movie seemed guessable to me (seeing you were able to identify a random outdoor chair in a park). Hence why it would have been important to spot the monster's feet between images #1 and #2.
More hints/images to come if needed.