Dark Souls
This review contains spoilers
To play Dark Souls in the modern era is to step out of the algorithmic stream of "content" and into a mausoleum. In a gaming landscape increasingly defined by dopamine loops, loot boxes, and the frictionless "smoothness" of user experience—where every edge is sanded down to ensure maximum engagement—Hidetaka Miyazaki’s 2011 magnum opus stands as a monolith of friction. It is a text that does not want to be consumed; it wants to be survived.
Through the lens of what we might call a "gothic materialism," Dark Souls offers the supreme articulation of hauntology in the video game medium. Lordran is not merely a fantasy kingdom; it is a world suffering from a terminal inability to end. The central conceit of the narrative—the Undead Curse and the fading of the First Flame—mirrors the cultural condition of the early 21st century: a state of stuckness, where the future has been cancelled, and we are left re-animating the corpses of the past in a desperate bid to maintain the status quo.
The atmosphere of Lordran is suffocated by the Eerie. As defined in The Weird and the Eerie, the Eerie is constituted by a failure of absence or a failure of presence. In Dark Souls, this is manifested in the silence. There is no dynamic, swelling orchestral score guiding your emotional state through the Undead Burg. There is only the crunch of metal, the moan of the hollowed, and the wind whistling through battlements that have lost their purpose. This silence strips away the ideological buffer that usually protects the player. When one arrives in Anor Londo, the City of the Gods, the horror is not in the monsters, but in the emptiness. It is a grand, golden space designed for a majesty that has long since fled. It is a dead mall on a theological scale, bathed in the artificial light of a false sun—a simulation of prosperity maintained by the illusionist Gwyndolin to prevent the populace from realizing the lights have already gone out.
Here, the game anticipates the melancholia of capitalist realism. The central choice offered to the player—to Link the Fire or to let it fade—is the ultimate political question of our time. To Link the Fire is to sacrifice oneself to the system, to burn your own humanity as fuel to extend the "Age of Gods" (the ruling hegemony) for a few more desperate cycles. It is the logic of the bailout, of austerity, of working oneself to death to prop up a structure that is already crumbling. Gwyn, Lord of Cinder, is not a triumphant king; he is a senile manager terrified of the dark, burning in his own kiln, refusing to let the new era begin because he cannot conceive of a world outside his own order.
The mechanics enforce this crushing weight. The difficulty of Dark Souls is often fetishized by "get gud" culture as a badge of meritocratic honor, but this reading misses the point. The difficulty is material. It reintroduces consequence into a virtuality that usually lacks it. The "You Died" screen is not just a failure state; it is a reminder of precarity. The loss of souls—the currency of experience and labor—mimics the anxiety of the gig economy, where one’s accumulation of value can be wiped out by a single misstep, with no safety net to catch the fall.
Yet, there is a strange, depressive hedonia in the loop. We return to the bonfire not because we expect to win, but because the ritual of labor provides a structure that the empty world outside lacks. In its refusal to hold the player’s hand, Dark Souls respects the player’s intelligence in a way that modern UI-cluttered games do not. It demands a forensic engagement with the environment. You must read the item descriptions, observe the placement of corpses, and internalize the geography. You must engage with the archeology of the world to understand why it is broken.
Ultimately, Dark Souls achieves the status of a masterpiece because it formalizes the feeling of living after the end of history. It captures the texture of a world where the grand narratives have collapsed, leaving us to wander through the ruins, fighting over scraps of humanity. It suggests that the "Dark"—the unknown, the cold, the age of Man—might be terrifying, but it is also the only alternative to the endless, agonizing recycling of a fire that should have burnt out long ago. In embracing the abyss, Dark Souls finds a way to be profoundly, terrifyingly real.
Through the lens of what we might call a "gothic materialism," Dark Souls offers the supreme articulation of hauntology in the video game medium. Lordran is not merely a fantasy kingdom; it is a world suffering from a terminal inability to end. The central conceit of the narrative—the Undead Curse and the fading of the First Flame—mirrors the cultural condition of the early 21st century: a state of stuckness, where the future has been cancelled, and we are left re-animating the corpses of the past in a desperate bid to maintain the status quo.
The atmosphere of Lordran is suffocated by the Eerie. As defined in The Weird and the Eerie, the Eerie is constituted by a failure of absence or a failure of presence. In Dark Souls, this is manifested in the silence. There is no dynamic, swelling orchestral score guiding your emotional state through the Undead Burg. There is only the crunch of metal, the moan of the hollowed, and the wind whistling through battlements that have lost their purpose. This silence strips away the ideological buffer that usually protects the player. When one arrives in Anor Londo, the City of the Gods, the horror is not in the monsters, but in the emptiness. It is a grand, golden space designed for a majesty that has long since fled. It is a dead mall on a theological scale, bathed in the artificial light of a false sun—a simulation of prosperity maintained by the illusionist Gwyndolin to prevent the populace from realizing the lights have already gone out.
Here, the game anticipates the melancholia of capitalist realism. The central choice offered to the player—to Link the Fire or to let it fade—is the ultimate political question of our time. To Link the Fire is to sacrifice oneself to the system, to burn your own humanity as fuel to extend the "Age of Gods" (the ruling hegemony) for a few more desperate cycles. It is the logic of the bailout, of austerity, of working oneself to death to prop up a structure that is already crumbling. Gwyn, Lord of Cinder, is not a triumphant king; he is a senile manager terrified of the dark, burning in his own kiln, refusing to let the new era begin because he cannot conceive of a world outside his own order.
The mechanics enforce this crushing weight. The difficulty of Dark Souls is often fetishized by "get gud" culture as a badge of meritocratic honor, but this reading misses the point. The difficulty is material. It reintroduces consequence into a virtuality that usually lacks it. The "You Died" screen is not just a failure state; it is a reminder of precarity. The loss of souls—the currency of experience and labor—mimics the anxiety of the gig economy, where one’s accumulation of value can be wiped out by a single misstep, with no safety net to catch the fall.
Yet, there is a strange, depressive hedonia in the loop. We return to the bonfire not because we expect to win, but because the ritual of labor provides a structure that the empty world outside lacks. In its refusal to hold the player’s hand, Dark Souls respects the player’s intelligence in a way that modern UI-cluttered games do not. It demands a forensic engagement with the environment. You must read the item descriptions, observe the placement of corpses, and internalize the geography. You must engage with the archeology of the world to understand why it is broken.
Ultimately, Dark Souls achieves the status of a masterpiece because it formalizes the feeling of living after the end of history. It captures the texture of a world where the grand narratives have collapsed, leaving us to wander through the ruins, fighting over scraps of humanity. It suggests that the "Dark"—the unknown, the cold, the age of Man—might be terrifying, but it is also the only alternative to the endless, agonizing recycling of a fire that should have burnt out long ago. In embracing the abyss, Dark Souls finds a way to be profoundly, terrifyingly real.
Mini Review: A monolith of friction against the "smoothness" of modern consumption. Lordran is a hauntological mausoleum, a world suffering from a terminal inability to end. Its silence evokes the Eerie—a "dead mall" on a theological scale. The game’s punishing mechanics are not merely a test of skill, but a materialization of precarity. It formalizes the melancholia of capitalist realism: the exhausting labor of propping up a crumbling system because we cannot conceive of a world beyond it.
Watch the Trailer
